Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) often go undiagnosed, leading to irreversible spinal cord dysfunction. Although digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the gold standard for diagnosing SDAVF, DSA is invasive and operator dependent, with associated risks. MR angiography (MRA) is a promising alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of MRA as an equal alternative to DSA in investigating, diagnosing, and localizing SDAVF. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from a single neurosurgeon at a large tertiary academic center were searched for SDAVFs. Eligibility criteria included any patient with a surgically proven SDAVF in whom preoperative DSA, MRA, or both had been obtained. The eligible patients formed a consecutive series, in which they were divided into DSA and MRA groups. DSA and MRA were the index tests that were compared to the surgical SDAVF outcome, which was the reference standard. Accurate diagnosis was considered to have occurred when the imaging report matched the operative diagnosis to the correct spinal level. Comparisons used a two-sample t-test for continuous variables and Fisher-Freeman-Halton's exact test for categorical variables, with p < 0.05 specifying significance. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were conducted to investigate group associations with DSA and MRA accuracy. Positive predictive value, sensitivity, and accuracy were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients with a mean age of 63 years underwent surgery for SDAVF. There were 19 male (70.4%) and 8 female (29.6%) patients, and the mean duration of symptoms at the time of surgery was 14 months (range 2-48 months). Seventeen patients (63%) presented with bowel or bladder incontinence. Bivariate analysis of the DSA and MRA groups further revealed no significant relationships between the characteristics and accuracy of SDAVF diagnosis. MRA was found to be more sensitive and accurate (100% and 73.3%) than DSA (85.7% and 69.2%), with a subanalysis of the patients with both preoperative MRA and DSA showing that MRA had a greater positive predictive value (78.6 vs 72.7), sensitivity (100 vs 72.7), and accuracy (78.6 vs 57.1) than DSA. CONCLUSIONS: In surgically proven cases of SDAVFs, the authors determined that MRA was more accurate than DSA for SDAVF diagnosis and localization to the corresponding vertebral level. Incomplete catheterization at each vertebral level may result in the failure of DSA to detect SDAVF.

The neurosurgery research & education foundation-young neurosurgeons committee webinar series: Providing education and inspiration during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) Young Neurosurgeons Committee (YNC) and Neurosurgery Research & Education Foundation (NREF) launched the YNC-NREF Webinar Series to provide young and aspiring neurosurgeons with timely information, education, and inspiration in the absence of in-person programming. DESIGN: Five 90-minute Zoom webinars were evaluated, each including 1-2 keynote speakers, a panel discussion, and an audience question-and-answer section. Topics included overviews of neurosurgery, the match, subspecialties, and inspirational career stories. Optional pre- and post-webinar surveys with 11-point Likert-type scores were distributed to attendees. We compared groups using chi-squared and Kruskal-Willis tests, and perceptions pre- and post-webinar using Mann-Whitney tests. SETTING: The webinars were live using Zoom, and the recordings were published on NREF's YouTube channel. PARTICIPANTS: The webinar series targeted young neurosurgeons. The first five episodes had a particular focus on medical students and undergraduates. RESULTS: A total of 673 unique participants attended the webinar series; 257 (38%) and 78 (11%) attendees completed the pre- and post-webinar survey, respectively. Respondents had high baseline interest in neurosurgery and were motivated to learn about the match and training in the US, understand neurosurgeons' day-to-day lives, and ask questions. There were significant differences in perceptions between USMSs, IMSs, and undergraduate students. The webinar improved attendees' knowledge about neurosurgical specialties, the match, and US neurosurgery training. CONCLUSIONS: The YNC and NREF effectively engaged a large, diverse audience through an online webinar series, building a foundation for future virtual programming by organized neurosurgery. ACGME competencies.

A Mixed-Methods Assessment of the Feasibility of Conducting Neurosurgical Clinical Research in Uganda.

BACKGROUND: Clinical research is necessary to evaluate neurosurgical interventions, yet clinical trials are conducted less frequently in low- and middle-income countries. Because specific barriers, facilitating factors, and strategies for neurosurgical clinical research in Uganda have not been previously identified, this study evaluated neurosurgical providers' perspectives on clinical research and documentation patterns of neurosurgical variables at Mulago National Referral Hospital. METHODS: Retrospective review of 166 neurosurgical patient charts assessed the frequency of documentation of key variables. Twenty-two providers working in neurosurgery participated in 6 focus group discussions with qualitative analysis utilizing the framework method. RESULTS: Chart review showed that primary diagnosis (99.4%), pupil light response (97.6%), and computed tomography scan results (93.3%) were documented for most patients. Cranial nerve exam (61.5%), pupil size (69.9%), and time to neurosurgical intervention (45%) were documented less frequently. On average, Glasgow Coma Scale was documented for 86.6% of days hospitalized, while vital signs were documented for 12.3%. In most focus group discussions, participants identified follow-up, financing, recruitment, time, approval, and sociocultural factors as research barriers. Participants described how the current health workforce facilitates successful research. To improve research capacity, suggested strategies focused on research networks, data collection, leadership, participant recruitment, infrastructure, and implementation. CONCLUSIONS: At Mulago National Referral Hospital, there was variability in the frequency of documentation of neurosurgical variables, which may impact data collection for future studies. While multiple barriers were identified, sociocultural, financing, and time barriers greatly impacted neurosurgical clinical research. Despite that, identified facilitating factors and strategies could be utilized to support neurosurgical research capacity growth.

Clinical course of ventriculoperitoneal shunting for hydrocephalus following glioblastoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection of glioblastoma (GBM) remains a cornerstone in the current treatment paradigm. The postoperative evolution of hydrocephalus necessitating ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) continues to be defined. Correspondingly the objective of this study was to aggregate pertinent metadata to better define the clinical course of VPS for hydrocephalus following glioblastoma surgery in light of contemporary management. METHODS: Searches of multiple electronic databases from inception to November 2023 were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened against pre-specified criteria. Outcomes were pooled by random-effects meta-analyses where possible. RESULTS: A total of 12 cohort studies satisfied all selection criteria, describing a total of 6,098 glioblastoma patients after surgery with a total of 261 (4%) of patients requiring postoperative VPS for hydrocephalus. Meta-analysis demonstrated the estimated pooled rate of symptomatic improvement following VPS was 78% (95% CI 66-88), and the estimated pooled rate of VPS revision was 24% (95% CI 16-33). Pooled time from index glioblastoma surgery to VPS surgery was 4.1 months (95% CI 2.8-5.3), and pooled survival time for index VPS surgery was 7.3 months (95% CI 5.4-9.4). Certainty of these outcomes were limited by the heterogenous and palliative nature of postoperative glioblastoma management. CONCLUSIONS: Of the limited proportion of glioblastoma patients requiring VPS surgery for hydrocephalus after index surgery, 78% patients are expected to show symptom improvement, and 24% can expect to undergo revision surgery. An individualized approach to each patient is required to optimize both index glioblastoma and VPS surgeries to account for anatomy and goals of care given the poor prognosis of this tumor overall.

An asynchronous web-based intervention for neurosurgery residents to improve education on cost-effective care.

OBJECTIVE: To gauge resident knowledge in the socioeconomic aspects of neurosurgery and assess the efficacy of an asynchronous, longitudinal, web-based, socioeconomics educational program tailored for neurosurgery residents. METHODS: Trainees completed a 20-question pre- and post-intervention knowledge examination including four educational categories: billing/coding, procedure-specific concepts, material costs, and operating room protocols. Structured data from 12 index cranial neurosurgical operations were organized into 5 online, case-based modules sent to residents within a single training program via weekly e-mail. Content from each educational category was integrated into the weekly modules for resident review. RESULTS: Twenty-seven neurosurgical residents completed the survey. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference between pre- vs post-intervention resident knowledge of billing/coding (79.2 % vs 88.2 %, p = 0.33), procedure-specific concepts (34.3 % vs 39.2 %, p = 0.11), material costs (31.7 % vs 21.6 %, p = 0.75), or operating room protocols (51.7 % vs 35.3 %, p = 0.61). However, respondents' accuracy increased significantly by 40.8 % on questions containing content presented more than 3 times during the 5-week study period, compared to an increased accuracy of only 2.2 % on questions containing content presented less often during the same time period (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline resident knowledge in socioeconomic aspects of neurosurgery is relatively lacking outside of billing/coding. Our socioeconomic educational intervention demonstrates some promise in improving socioeconomic knowledge among neurosurgery trainees, particularly when content is presented frequently. This decentralized, web-based approach to resident education may serve as a future model for self-driven learning initiatives among neurosurgical residents with minimal disruption to existing workflows.

Patient reported outcomes and treatment satisfaction in patients with cushing syndrome.

PURPOSE: Cushing Syndrome (CS) is a rare endocrine disorder associated with physical and mental symptoms that can drastically affect quality of life (QoL). This study characterizes QoL in patients with CS, describes their treatment experiences, and identifies patient subsets associated with decreased QoL or shared impressions of treatment. METHODS: A 136-question survey addressing QoL factors and treatment experiences was completed by adult patients with CS from the Cushing Support and Research Foundation. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment information were collected. Bivariate analyses were conducted to determine if patients' symptoms or treatment experiences were significantly associated with demographics or other variables. RESULTS: A total of 178 patients, predominantly female (94%) with mean age 53 years, completed the survey. Anxiety and/or depression (n = 163, 94%), loss of physical strength (n = 164, 93%), loneliness (n = 156, 90%), fatigue from treatment (n = 142, 89%), memory loss (n = 153, 88%), insomnia (n = 144, 83%), and pain (n = 141, 83%) were symptoms most commonly experienced by respondents. Patients experiencing delay of diagnosis >10 years were more likely to have suicidal thoughts (p = 0.002). Younger patients were more likely to express concerns about hair loss (p = 0.007), loneliness (p = 0.025), pain (p = 0.004), or the impact of CS on their marriage (p = 0.039) or children (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrates CS impacts patients across many dimensions, emphasizing the need for holistic support. We identified patient subsets in which QoL may be improved with additional patient resources or provider attention.

Retrospective Review of Surgical Site Infections after Endoscopic Endonasal Sellar and Parasellar Surgery: Multicenter Quality Data from the North American Skull Base Society.

Introduction Transnasal access to the anterior skull base provides a minimally invasive approach for sellar and parasellar masses compared with its open counterparts. The unique microbiome of the sinonasal mucosa provides distinct challenges not encountered with other cranial approaches. The use of antibiotics in these cases has not been standardized, and data remain scarce regarding infectious outcomes. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of shared quality data points for the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for pituitary adenomas, along with other sellar and parasellar region masses that were included by participating institutions. Patient and operative characteristics, perioperative and postoperative antibiotic regimens and their durations, intraoperative and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak, and onset of postoperative meningitis and sinusitis were compared. Results Fifteen institutions participated and provided 6 consecutive months' worth of case data. Five hundred ninety-three cases were included in the study, of which 564 were pituitary adenomectomies. The incidences of postoperative meningitis and sinusitis were low (0.67 and 2.87% for all pathologies, respectively; 0.35% meningitis for pituitary adenomas) and did not correlate with any specific antibiotic regimen. Immunocompromised status posed an increased odds of meningitis in pituitary adenomectomies (28.6, 95% confidence interval [1.72-474.4]). Conclusions The results show no clear benefit to postoperative antimicrobial use in EEA, with further larger studies needed.

Assessing the Success and Sustainability of Global Neurosurgery Collaborations: Systematic Review and Adaptation of the Framework for Assessment of InteRNational Surgical Success Criteria.

BACKGROUND: The high unmet neurosurgical burden in low- and middle-income countries has necessitated multiple global neurosurgical collaborations. We identified these collaborations and their peer-reviewed journal publications and evaluated them using a modified version of the Framework for Assessment of InteRNational Surgical Success (FAIRNeSS). METHODS: A systematic literature review yielded 265 articles describing neurosurgery-focused collaborations. A subset of 101 papers from 17 collaborations were evaluated with the modified FAIRNeSS criteria. Analysis of trends was performed for both individual articles and collaborations. RESULTS: Most of the articles were general reviews (64), and most focused on clinical research (115). The leading collaboration focus was workforce and infrastructure development (45%). Composite FAIRNeSS scores ranged from 7/34 to 30/34. Average FAIRNeSS scores for individual articles ranged from 0.25 to 26.75, while collaboration-wide FAIRNeSS score averages ranged from 5.25 to 20.04. There was significant variability within each subset of FAIRNeSS indicators (P value <0.001). Short-term goals had higher scores than medium- and long-term goals (P value <0.001). Collaboration composite scores correlated with the number of papers published (R2 = 0.400, P = 0.007) but not with the number of years active (R2 = 0.072, P = 0.3). Finally, the overall agreement between reviewers was 53.5%, and the overall correlation was 38.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Global neurosurgery has no established metrics for evaluating collaborations; therefore, we adapted the FAIRNeSS criteria to do so. The criteria may not be well suited for measuring the success and sustainability of global neurosurgery collaborations, creating a need to develop a more applicable alternate set of metrics.

A consensus definition of supratotal resection for anatomically distinct primary glioblastoma: an AANS/CNS Section on Tumors survey of neurosurgical oncologists.

INTRODUCTION: Supratotal resection (SpTR) of glioblastoma may be associated with improved survival, but published results have varied in part from lack of consensus on the definition and appropriate use of SpTR. A previous small survey of neurosurgical oncologists with expertise performing SpTR found resection 1-2 cm beyond contrast enhancement was an acceptable definition and glioblastoma involving the right frontal and bilateral anterior temporal lobes were considered most amenable to SpTR. The general neurosurgical oncology community has not yet confirmed the practicality of this definition. METHODS: Seventy-six neurosurgical oncology members of the AANS/CNS Tumor Section were surveyed, representing 34.0% of the 223 members who were administered the survey. Participants were presented with 11 definitions of SpTR and rated each definition's appropriateness. Participants additionally reviewed magnetic resonance imaging for 10 anatomically distinct glioblastomas and assessed the tumor location's eloquence, perceived equipoise of enrolling patients in a randomized trial comparing gross total to SpTR, and their personal treatment plans. RESULTS: Most neurosurgeons surveyed agree that gross total plus resection of some non-contrast enhancement (n = 57, 80.3%) or resection 1-2 cm beyond contrast enhancement (n = 52, 73.2%) are appropriate definitions for SpTR. Cases were divided into three anatomically distinct groups by perceived equipoise between gross total and SpTR. The best clinical trial candidates were thought to be right anterior temporal (n = 58, 76.3%) and right frontal (n = 55, 73.3%) glioblastomas. CONCLUSION: Support exists among neurosurgical oncologists with varying familiarity performing SpTR to adopt the proposed consensus definition of SpTR of glioblastoma and to potentially investigate the utility of SpTR to treat right anterior temporal and right frontal glioblastomas in a clinical trial. A smaller proportion of general neurosurgical oncologists than SpTR experts would personally treat a left anterior temporal glioblastoma with SpTR.

Frailty in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Emerging literature suggests that frailty may be an important driver of postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for brain tumors. We systematically reviewed the literature on frailty in patients with brain tumor with respect to 3 questions: What methods of frailty assessment have been applied to patients with brain tumor? What thresholds have been defined to distinguish between different levels of frailty? What clinical outcomes does frailty predict in patients with brain tumor? METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Included studies were specific to patients with brain tumor, used a validated instrument to assess frailty, and measured the impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Of 753 citations, 21 studies met our inclusion criteria. Frailty instruments were studied, in order of frequency reported, including the 5-factor modified frailty index, 11-factor modified frailty index, Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty-defining diagnosis indicator, and Hopkins Frailty Score. Multiple different conventions and thresholds were reported for distinguishing the levels of frailty. Clinical outcomes associated with frailty included mortality, survival, complications, length of stay, charges, costs, discharge disposition, readmissions, and operative time. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is an increasingly popular concept in patients with brain tumor that is associated with important clinical outcomes. However, the extant literature is largely comprised of retrospective studies with heterogeneous definitions of frailty, thresholds for defining levels of frailty, and patient populations. Further work is needed to understand best practices in assessing frailty in patients with brain tumor and applying these concepts to clinical practice.

Predictors and Impact of Postoperative 30-Day Readmission in Glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative 30-day readmissions have been shown to negatively affect survival and other important outcomes in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). OBJECTIVE: To further investigate patient readmission risk factors of primary and recurrent patients with GBM. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed records of 418 adult patients undergoing 575 craniotomies for histologically confirmed GBM at an academic medical center. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and clinical characteristics were collected and compared by patient readmission status using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U testing. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors that predicted 30-day readmissions. RESULTS: The cohort included 69 (12%) 30-day readmissions after 575 operations. Readmitted patients experienced significantly lower median overall survival (11.3 vs 16.4 months, P = .014), had a lower mean Karnofsky Performance Scale score (66.9 vs 74.2, P = .005), and had a longer initial length of stay (6.1 vs 5.3 days, P = .007) relative to their nonreadmitted counterparts. Readmitted patients experienced more postoperative deep vein thromboses or pulmonary embolisms (12% vs 4%, P = .006), new motor deficits (29% vs 14%, P = .002), and nonhome discharges (39% vs 22%, P = .005) relative to their nonreadmitted counterparts. Multivariable analysis demonstrated increased odds of 30-day readmission with each 10-point decrease in Karnofsky Performance Scale score (odds ratio [OR] 1.32, P = .002), each single-point increase in 5-factor modified frailty index (OR 1.51, P = .016), and initial presentation with cognitive deficits (OR 2.11, P = .013). CONCLUSION: Preoperatively available clinical characteristics strongly predicted 30-day readmissions in patients undergoing surgery for GBM. Opportunities may exist to optimize preoperative and postoperative management of at-risk patients with GBM, with downstream improvements in clinical outcomes.

Clinical predictors of survival for patients with atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors.

PURPOSE: Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RTs) are malignant central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms of the young. Our study analyzed a large AT/RT cohort from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to elucidate predictors of short-term mortality and overall survival (OS). METHODS: Information was collected on patients with histologically confirmed AT/RT using the NCDB (2004-2016). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated OS. Prognostic factors for 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and OS were determined via multivariate Cox proportional hazards (CPH) and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Our cohort of 189 patients had a median age of 1 year (IQR [1, 4]) and tumor size of 4.7 ± 2.0 cm at diagnosis. Seventy-two percent were under 3 years old; 55.6% were male and 71.0% were Caucasian. Fifty (27.2%) patients received only surgery (S) (OS = 5.91 months), 51 (27.7%) received surgery and chemotherapy (S + CT) (OS = 11.2 months), and 9 (4.89%) received surgery and radiotherapy (S + RT) (OS = 10.3 months). Forty-five (24.5%) received S + CT + RT combination therapy (OS = 45.4 months), 13 (17.1%) received S + CT + BMT/SCT (bone marrow or stem cell transplant) (OS = 55.5 months), and 16 (8.70%) received S + CT + RT + BMT/SCT (OS = 68.4 months). Bivariate analysis of dichotomized age (HR = 0.550, 95% CI [0.357, 0.847], p = 0.0067) demonstrated significantly increased patient survival if diagnosed at or above 1 year old. On multivariate analysis, administration of S + CT + RT, S + CT + BMT/SCT, or S + CT + RT + BMT/SCT combination therapy predicted significantly (p < 0.05) increased OS compared to surgery alone. CONCLUSION: AT/RTs are CNS tumors where those diagnosed under 1 year old have a significantly worse prognosis. Our study demonstrates that while traditional CT, RT, and BMT/SCT combination regimens prolong life, overall survival in this population is still low.

Early repeat resection for residual glioblastoma: decision-making among an international cohort of neurosurgeons.

OBJECTIVE: The importance of extent of resection (EOR) in glioblastoma (GBM) has been thoroughly demonstrated. However, few studies have explored the practices and benefits of early repeat resection (ERR) when residual tumor deemed resectable is unintentionally left after an initial resection, and the survival benefit of ERR is still unknown. Herein, the authors aimed to internationally survey current practices regarding ERR and to analyze differences based on geographic location and practice setting. METHODS: The authors distributed a survey to the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons Tumor Section, Society of British Neurological Surgeons, European Association of Neurosurgical Society, and Latin American Federation of Neurosurgical Societies. Neurosurgeons responded to questions about their training, practice setting, and current ERR practices. They also reported the EOR threshold below which they would pursue ERR and their likelihood of performing ERR using a Likert scale of 1-5 (5 being the most likely) in two sets of 5 cases, the first set for a patient's initial hospitalization and the second for a referred patient who had undergone resection elsewhere. The resection likelihood index for each respondent was calculated as the mean Likert score across all cases. RESULTS: Overall, 180 neurosurgeons from 25 countries responded to the survey. Neurosurgeons performed ERRs very rarely in their practices (< 1% of all GBM cases), with an EOR threshold of 80.2% (75%-95%). When presented with 10 cases, the case context (initial hospitalization vs referred patient) did not significantly change the surgeon ERR likelihood, although ERR likelihood did vary significantly on the basis of tumor location (p < 0.0001). Latin American neurosurgeons were more likely to pursue ERR in the provided cases. Neurosurgeons were more likely to pursue ERR when the tumor was MGMT methylated versus unmethylated, with a resection likelihood index of 3.78 and 3.21, respectively (p = 0.004); however, there was no significant difference between IDH mutant and IDH wild-type tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this survey reveal current practices regarding ERR, but they also demonstrate the variability in how neurosurgeons approach ERR. Standardized guidelines based on future studies incorporating tumor molecular characteristics are needed to guide neurosurgeons in their decision-making on this complicated issue.

Comparison and evolution of transcranial versus endoscopic endonasal approaches for suprasellar Meningiomas: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Meningiomas of the tuberculum sellae (TS) and planum sphenoidale (PS) are challenging to treat surgically. Transcranial approaches (TCAs) were the mainstay before endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) were developed, however the efficacy and safety of EEA approaches relative to TCA approaches remains unclear. METHODS: The authors conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of existing literature detailing the outcomes of both approaches. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Studies were included if they analyzed TS and/or PS meningiomas, included ≥ 5 patients, and reported at least one outcome of interest. RESULTS: Overall, 44 retrospective studies met inclusion criteria, the majority being from single centers, between 2004 and 2020. In studies directly comparing postoperative outcomes among TCA and EEA approaches, EEA had significantly higher odds of visual improvement (OR = 3.24, p = 0.0053) and significantly higher odds of CSF leak (OR = 3.71, p = 0.0098) relative to TCA. Further, there were no significant differences between visual worsening (p = 0.17), complications (p = 0.51), and GTR rates (p = 0.30) for the two approaches. Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant association between nasoseptal flap (NSF) use and postoperative outcomes among EEA patients. There was also no significant association between study publication year and postoperative EEA outcomes. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that EEA offers a viable alternative to TCA in the treatment of suprasellar meningiomas. In particular, EEA shows promise for superior visual outcomes, though postoperative CSF leaks are an important consideration among patients undergoing this approach.

Clinical features and surgical outcomes of intracranial and spinal cord subependymomas.

OBJECTIVE: Subependymomas are low-grade ependymal tumors whose clinical characteristics, radiographic features, and postsurgical outcomes are incompletely characterized due to their rarity. The authors present an institutional case series and a systematic literature review to achieve a better understanding of subependymomas. METHODS: Adult patients with histologically confirmed subependymoma or mixed subependymoma-ependymoma surgically treated at a tertiary hospital between 1992 and 2020 were identified. A systematic literature review of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases from inception until December 4, 2020, was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Data extracted from both groups included demographics, radiographic features, tumor characteristics, management, and follow-up variables. RESULTS: Forty-eight unique patients with subependymoma were identified by chart review; of these patients, 8 (16.7%) had mixed subependymoma-ependymoma tumors. The median age at diagnosis was 49 years (IQR 19.8 years), and 26 patients (54.2%) were male. Forty-two patients (87.5%) had intracranial subependymomas, and 6 (12.5%) had spinal tumors. The most common presentation was headache (n = 20, 41.7%), although a significant number of tumors were diagnosed incidentally (n = 16, 33.3%). Among the 42 patients with intracranial tumors, 15 (35.7%) had hydrocephalus, and the most common surgical strategy was a suboccipital approach with or without C1 laminectomy (n = 26, 61.9%). Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 33 cases (68.7%), and 2 patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. Most patients had no major postsurgical complications (n = 34, 70.8%), and only 1 (2.1%) had recurrence after GTR. Of 2036 reports initially identified in the systematic review, 39 were eligible for inclusion, comprising 477 patients. Of 462 patients for whom tumor location was reported, 406 (87.9%) were intracranial, with the lateral ventricle as the most common location (n = 214, 46.3%). Spinal subependymomas occurred in 53 patients (11.5%), with 3 cases (0.6%) in multiple locations. Similar to the case series at the authors' institution, headache was the most common presenting symptom (n = 231, 54.0%) among the 428 patients whose presentation was reported. Twenty-seven patients (6.3%) were diagnosed incidentally, and 36 cases (8.4%) were found at autopsy. Extent of resection was reported for 350 patients, and GTR was achieved in 250 (71.4%). Fifteen of 337 patients (4.5%) had recurrence or progression. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' case series and literature review demonstrate that patients with subependymoma are well managed with resection and generally have a favorable prognosis.

Predictors of Academic Career Trajectory Among Fellowship-Trained Neurosurgical Oncologists.

Much research has been conducted to investigate predictors of an academic career trajectory among neurosurgeons in general. This study seeks to examine a cohort of fellowship-trained neurosurgical oncologists to determine which factors are associated with a career in academia. Publicly available data on fellowship-trained neurosurgical oncologists was aggregated from ACGME-accredited residency websites, from program websites listed on the AANS Neurosurgical Fellowship Training Program Directory, and from professional websites including Doximity. Bivariate analyses were conducted to determine covariates for a logistic regression model, and a multivariate analysis was conducted to determine which variables were independently associated with an academic career trajectory. A total of 87 neurosurgical oncologists were identified (1991-2018). A total of 73 (83.9%) had > 1 year of protected research time in residency, 33 (37.9%) had an h-index of ≥2 prior to residency, and 63 (72.4%) had an h-index of ≥2 during residency. In multivariate analysis, the only factor independently associated with academic career trajectory among neurosurgical oncologists was achieving an h-index of ≥2 during residency (odds ratio [OR] = 2.93, p = .041). Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center graduated the most neurosurgical oncologists in our cohort (n = 23). Our study establishes a novel factor that is predictive of academic career trajectory among fellowship-trained neurosurgical oncologists, specifically having an h-index of ≥2 during residency. Our results may be useful for those mentoring students and trainees with an interest in pursuing academia.

Launching the Quality Outcomes Database Tumor Registry: rationale, development, and pilot data.

OBJECTIVE: Neurosurgeons generate an enormous amount of data daily. Within these data lie rigorous, valid, and reproducible evidence. Such evidence can facilitate healthcare reform and improve quality of care. To measure the quality of care provided objectively, evaluating the safety and efficacy of clinical activities should occur in real time. Registries must be constructed and collected data analyzed with the precision akin to that of randomized clinical trials to accomplish this goal. METHODS: The Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) Tumor Registry was launched in February 2019 with 8 sites in its initial 1-year pilot phase. The Tumor Registry was proposed by the AANS/CNS Tumor Section and approved by the QOD Scientific Committee in the fall of 2018. The initial pilot phase aimed to assess the feasibility of collecting outcomes data from 8 academic practices across the United States; these outcomes included length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient complications. RESULTS: As of November 2019, 923 eligible patients have been entered, with the following subsets: intracranial metastasis (17.3%, n = 160), high-grade glioma (18.5%, n = 171), low-grade glioma (6%, n = 55), meningioma (20%, n = 184), pituitary tumor (14.3%, n = 132), and other intracranial tumor (24%, n = 221). CONCLUSIONS: The authors have demonstrated here, as a pilot study, the feasibility of documenting demographic, clinical, operative, and patient-reported outcome characteristics longitudinally for 6 common intracranial tumor types.

Adapting the 5-factor modified frailty index for prediction of postprocedural outcome in patients with unruptured aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) is a practical tool that can be used to estimate frailty by measuring five accessible factors: functional status, history of diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and hypertension. The authors aimed to validate the utility of mFI-5 for predicting endovascular and microsurgical treatment outcomes in patients with unruptured aneurysms. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of consecutive patients with unruptured aneurysm who were treated with clip placement or endovascular therapy was used. Because patient age is an important predictor of treatment outcomes in patients with unruptured aneurysm, mFI-5 was supplemented with age to create the age-supplemented mFI-5 (AmFI-5). Associations of scores on these indices with major complications (symptomatic ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, or surgical site infection requiring reoperation) were evaluated. Validation was carried out with the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2006-2017). RESULTS: The institutional database included 275 patients (88 underwent clip placement, and 187 underwent endovascular treatment). Multivariable analysis of the surgical cohort showed that major complication was significantly associated with mFI-5 (OR 2.0, p = 0.046) and AmFI-5 (OR 1.9, p = 0.028) scores. Significant predictive accuracy for major complications was provided by mFI-5 (c-statistic = 0.709, p = 0.011) and AmFI-5 (c-statistic = 0.720, p = 0.008). The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA) provided poor discrimination (area under the curve = 0.541, p = 0.618) that was significantly less than that of mFI-5 (p = 0.023) and AmFI-5 (p = 0.014). Optimal relative fit was achieved with AmFI-5, which had the lowest Akaike information criterion value. Similar results were obtained after equivalent analysis of the endovascular cohort, with additional significant associations between index scores and length of stay (ß = 0.6 and p = 0.009 for mFI-5; ß = 0.5 and p = 0.003 for AmFI-5). In 1047 patients who underwent clip placement and were included in the NSQIP database, mFI-5 (p = 0.001) and AmFI-5 (p < 0.001) scores were significantly associated with severe postoperative adverse events and provided greater discrimination (c-statistic = 0.600 and p < 0.001 for mFI-5; c-statistic = 0.610 and p < 0.001 for AmFI-5) than ASA score (c-statistic = 0.580 and p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: mFI-5 and AmFI-5 represent potential predictors of procedure-related complications in unruptured aneurysm patients. After further validation, integration of these tools into clinical workflows may optimize patients for intervention.